Atonomi

Security Protocol for the Internet of Things

About Atonomi

Atonomi provides a new security protocol and infrastructure for IoT interoperability, based on rooting the identity and reputation of devices on a blockchain-based immutable ledger. Atonomi aims to solve the problem of validating device identity and reputation by creating a secure ecosystem for IoT device interaction and commerce on the Atonomi Network.Atonomi will be built on Ethereum and include a registration service for establishing identity, a protocol and system for reputation management (based on devices’ unique behavioral signatures), and an SDK for OEM integration. “The Atonomi Token [will be] used within the security protocol for device registration, activation, reputation management, and commerce transactions. Key participants such as OEM/device manufacturers, distributors, device owners and auditors are anticipated to seek Atonomi Token rewards for participating in the Atonomi Network.”
Atonomi is being developed by CENTRI Technology, creator of Internet of Things Advanced Security – a standards-based, chip-to-cloud, software IoT security solution, that uses hardware-based ID to establish trust and provides simultaneous data encryption and compression. The company was founded in 2010, is based in Seattle, and states that its “current partners include the largest IoT ecosystem players like Arm, Flex, Microsoft, Intel, and others.” CENTRIs core technology is protected by 10 patents linked to from the project’s website and whitepaper.

Competition: IOTA, IBM Blockchain (Watson IoT), WISeKey, XAIN and Porsche, xage, slock.it, Nokia Sensing as a Service, and others.
Differentiation: Infrastructural focus on device identity and reputation management. Company is already established in IoT security.

Token Sale Use of Blockchain

Product

3.4
Product
Readiness

Is the product ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

1.0
N/A
1 - Nothing yet, just an idea.
Appeal

How appealing is the product? How good or necessary is it? Does it have a distinct edge?

4.0
N/A
4 - Captivating.
Target User Base

Is it mass market or niche?

5.0
N/A
5 - General audience / mass market.
Competition

Are there many other similar solutions or is this one of just a few, or even one of a kind?

2.0
N/A
2 - Quite a few / somewhat better competitors.
Innovation

How innovative or inventive is the product, either conceptually or technologically?

5.0
N/A
5 - Highly specialized, proprietary.

Product

* Atonomi’s solution primarily consists of a blockchain-based Identity Registry and a Reputation Tracking service for IoT devices, along with an SDK for OEM integration. The Atonomi OEM stack is to be embedded into the chip/OEM software code (‘chip-first solution’).
* Atonomi is being developed by CENTRI Technology, creator of Internet of Things Advanced Security, whose technology is protected by 10 issued patents linked to from the project’s website and whitepaper. While CENTRI’s technology appears to be operational and commercially available, the Atonomi solution appears to be in initial stages (see Whitepaper). In January, the company announced a pilot program with Swytch, but without specifying dates for the program’s launch or duration.
* New manufacturers joining the Atonomi Network will be screened by existing members, assigned a default reputation score, and provided with a unique identifier for registering their devices. Trusted manufacturers will submit their devices via whitelist to the Identity Registry consensus service, which will be operated by select network members running a limited number of server instances.
* Device reputation will be collected, stored, and managed by a distributed network of ‘Audit partners’ which will be paid with through fees with Atonomi Tokens to track and score device behavior. How reputation scores will be calculated is not discussed in detail, only in very general terms.
* Competition includes IOTA, IBM Blockchain (Watson IoT), WISeKey, XAIN and Porsche, xage, slock.it, Nokia Sensing as a Service, and others.

Product Whitepaper

Use of Blockchain

3.8
Use of Blockchain
Blockchain Development

Is blockchain technology essential? Does it make the solution significantly different and better?

3.0
N/A
3 - Automation; making something easier to do.
Disruptive Blockchain Advantage

How disruptive is the introduction of blockchain technology into the product's market space?

4.0
N/A
4 - Generally disruptive.
Need for a Custom Token (vs. BTC or ETH)

Is the token essential or could it be done just as well or better with fiat or Bitcoin?

4.0
N/A
4 - Token is essential to platform.
System Decentralization (besides token)

How decentralized is the system architecture other than the token (e.g., data collection, storage, access, and use, or decision making processes, etc.)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Hybrid; decentralized as far as circumstances allow.
Contribution to Blockchain Ecosystem

How compelling is the solution's contribution to the evolution of blockchain infrastructure and economy?

5.0
N/A
5 - Wow.

Use of Blockchain

* Atonomi’s Ethereum-based architecture combines on and off chain resources for scaling, though how exactly is not discussed. The whitepaper states that the company believes Ethereum to be sufficient for immediate use (since many of the platform’s operations do not require high throughput writes), but also intends to evaluate migration to or use of other solutions such as Plasma, Sharding, Swarm, Raiden, HashGraph, and others.
* The whitepaper states that the three patented technologies integrated into Atonomi’s service layer are: secure communications services (capable of creating a secure session in 3 milliseconds on average), multi-layer crypto key management (decentralized), and a fast indexing and searching method for decentralized encrypted data.
* The Identity Registry consensus service will be operated by select network members running a limited number of server instances. New manufacturers will be screened by existing members, and trusted manufacturers will submit their devices via whitelist to the consensus service.
* Device reputation will be managed by a distributed network of ‘Audit partners’ which will be paid with through fees with Atonomi Tokens. How reputation scores will be calculated is not discussed in detail, only in very general terms.
* Only Atonomi will be able to write to the Manufacturer Registry and the Auditor Registry. Manufacturers will be able to write to the Device Registry, while Auditors will be able to write to the Reputation Registry. Writing to the Device and Reputation registries may require or be rewarded with tokens.

Use of Blockchain Roadmap

Whitepaper

3.6
Whitepaper
Comprehensiveness

Does it cover the full scope of the problem and solution?

3.0
N/A
3 - Covers most key issues; a few holes.
Readability

Is it easy enough to understand?

4.0
N/A
4 - Easy to read and understand.
Transparency

Does it candidly describe and disclose where the project now stands, how much exists and how much still needs to be done, etc.?

4.0
N/A
4 - Informative disclosure.
Business Plan Presentation

Does it contain a viable, comprehensive business plan?

3.0
N/A
3 - More information required.
Technology Presentation

Does it present a well thought out technological architecture? Does it address implementational challenges?

4.0
N/A
4 - Clear, well thought out, realistic.

Whitepaper

The 26-page whitepaper is clear, concise, and easy to read. The whitepaper provides a well thought out planned architecture, with use of smart contracts, roles, use cases, etc., and goes into specifics in describing the applicability and advantages of CENTRI’s technology, but lacks definitiveness on features and particulars of the decentralized solution (such as how reputation scores are to be calculated, or what will be the payments/fees/rewards for different usage scenarios). The whitepaper contains a list with USPTO links to the company’s 10 patents.

Whitepaper Compliance

Roadmap

3.4
Roadmap
Concreteness

Is there a concrete and practical development plan (vs. just a conceptual vision)?

2.0
N/A
2 - Vague, noncommittal.
Feasibility

Is the development plan realistic? Is it based on reasonable goals and timelines?

4.0
N/A
4 - Realistic.
Vision

Is there a larger, long-term vision?

5.0
N/A
5 - Paving the way for the future.
Dependencies (services or capabilities)

How available, operational, or trusted are the other systems or capabilities on which the project relies?

3.0
N/A
3 - Imperfect but available, or using substitutes.
Current Position

Where is the project now, relative to its vision and plans?

3.0
N/A
3 - Getting there.

Roadmap

* No development roadmap is provided as of yet, not in the whitepaper nor on the website.
* A press release from Dec 2017 states that “Building on Ethereum technology, the Atonomi Network will provide an immutable blockchain-based identity and reputation service to secure the vast realm of IoT devices – ranging from home automation systems, to smart-city infrastructure, to industrial sensors and controllers.” The whitepaper states that the company believes Ethereum to be sufficient for immediate use (since many of the platform’s operations do not require high throughput writes), but also intends to evaluate migration to or use of other solutions such as Plasma, Sharding, Swarm, Raiden, HashGraph, and others.
* The press release also mentions that the project is backed by venture capital firm LaunchCapital.
* The company announced on January 15, 2018 that Swytch (renewable energy blockchain platform), will be the first organization to pilot the Atonomi Network.

Roadmap Company and Team

Compliance

2.8
Compliance
Token Utility (value through usage)

How much use is there for the token itself (regardless of its value as an investment vehicle)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Limited or uncertain use cases.
Token as Security (tradable instrument)

How valuable is the token as an investment vehicle or financial instrument?

4.0
N/A
4 - Not as such, or compliance is assured.
Token/Smart-Contract Readiness

Is the blockchain infrastructure of the project ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

1.0
N/A
1 - Nothing yet, just an idea.
Attention to Compliance Issues

How much attention is given to compliance (via token and ecosystem design, token sale participation, etc.)? Is this issue addressed directly and coherently?

5.0
N/A
5 - Professional, audited.
Legal Review/Risk Assessment

What kind of legal documentation (reviews or agreements) and risk assessment are provided?

1.0
N/A
1 - None available.

Compliance

* “The Atonomi Token [will be] used within the security protocol for device registration, activation, reputation management, and commerce transactions. Key participants such as OEM/device manufacturers, distributors, device owners and auditors are anticipated to seek Atonomi Token rewards for participating in the Atonomi Network.” Details regarding token utility, smart contract functionality, fee structures, etc. are not yet available.
* No legal documentation, disclaimer, risk assessment, etc. are provided at this time. This is entirely justifiable at the moment however, since the Atonomi Tokens are not yet being sold. In waiting to launch the token, the company may in fact be showing that it is highly aware of compliance issues and treating them professionally.

Compliance Token Sale

Company and Team

4.6
Company and Team
Company Stage and Foundation

Is the company already established? Has it raised funds before? Is it mature?

5.0
N/A
5 - Well established, has raised significant funds.
Background of Lead Team Members

Do we know who they are? Do they have LinkedIn profiles? Do they have solid, relevant backgrounds?

5.0
N/A
5 - Accomplished, recognized.
Team Assembly and Commitment

Is a solid, fully committed core team in place? Do they have online (e.g. LinkedIn) profiles showing sufficient relevant experience? Is their participation transparent?

4.0
N/A
4 - Fully assembled and committed.
Team Skill Set Relevance

Does the amount of talent and skill in each area seem to fit the project requirements?

5.0
N/A
5 - Meeting and exceeding project requirements.
Team Skill Set Balance

Is the team well-rounded (biz/tech/blockchain)? Is there sufficient talent and skill in all areas of required development?

4.0
N/A
4 - Good, sufficient for each aspect.

Company and Team

* Atonomi is being developed by CENTRI Technology, creator of Internet of Things Advanced Security. The company was founded in 2010, is based in Seattle, and states that its “current partners include the largest IoT ecosystem players like Arm, Flex, Microsoft, Intel, and others.” According to Crunchbase, CENTRI has so far raised $13.8M in 5 rounds, and the Atonomi project is stated to be backed by venture capital firm LaunchCapital. CENTRI’s core technology is protected by 10 patents linked to from the project’s website and whitepaper.
* The Atonomi core team is comprised of Founder and CEO Vaughan Emery (also Founder and CEO of CENTRI), Co-Founder and VP-Product David Fragale (former director at PwC and fellow and researcher at MIT), CTO and VP-Engineering Mike Mackey (same position at CENTRI, said to lead a 15-person engineering team), Chief Data Scientist Dr. Luis Paris (same position at CENTRI, website states that his PhD work led to the creation of CENTRI’s core technologies), and Strategic Development Partner Andrii Zamovsky (founder of Orderbook Ambisafe, and NoveltyLab). Additional team members are not listed but presumably include developers at CENTRI.
* Advisors include Dr. John Clippinger (Researcher at MIT, cofounder Token Commons), Peter Kinnaird (Head of Product at Ambisafe), Dr. David Kravitz (VP – Crypto Systems Research at DarkMatter, with former positions at IBM, TrustCentral, Certicom, Motorola, and others), Dr. Ulf Lindqvist (Senior Technical Director at SRI International), Rob May (Co-Founder and CEO at Talla and Botchain), and David Jevans (CEO at CipherTrace, Chairman at Anti-Phishing Working Group).
* While blockchain expertise appears to be provided mostly by advisors rather than the team, CENTRI is established in the field of IoT security, so its team members have extensive experience which is highly related and relevant.
* Atonomi’s website features the following statement: “Secure interoperability is essential for the Internet of Things to reach its full potential. The Atonomi blockchain technology vision for a global service that enables secure transactions and commerce through device identity and reputation is something Arm is excited to see realized.” -Ian Ferguson, VP Ecosystem Development, IoT Services Group at ARM

Company and Team Product

Token Sale

3.2
Token Sale
Raise Amount Max

Is there a clear cap? Is the maximum raise amount modestly sufficient (as opposed to either greedy or insufficient)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Justifiable.
Raise Amount Min

Is the minimum raise reasonable considering the development plan? Are there raise-amount dependent milestones?

3.0
N/A
3 - Justifiable.
Fund Allocation

Is fund distribution and allocation reasonable and justified?

3.0
N/A
3 - Rough estimates, but sensible.
Token Allocation

Is the ratio of tokens sold to those kept reasonable? Does it prevent the company from having too much control?

3.0
N/A
3 - Sufficient company/community interest balance.
Media Presence and Following

Is the sale being talked about in Reddit, Bitcointalk, Social Media, Medium, etc.? Is information available and accessible? Is there interest?

4.0
N/A
4 - Solid exposure and interest, good impression.

Token Sale

* No details regarding the token sale are available as of yet.
* There does, however, seem to be noticeably growing interest, media presence and following.

Product

* Atonomi’s solution primarily consists of a blockchain-based Identity Registry and a Reputation Tracking service for IoT devices, along with an SDK for OEM integration. The Atonomi OEM stack is to be embedded into the chip/OEM software code (‘chip-first solution’).
* Atonomi is being developed by CENTRI Technology, creator of Internet of Things Advanced Security, whose technology is protected by 10 issued patents linked to from the project’s website and whitepaper. While CENTRI’s technology appears to be operational and commercially available, the Atonomi solution appears to be in initial stages (see Whitepaper). In January, the company announced a pilot program with Swytch, but without specifying dates for the program’s launch or duration.
* New manufacturers joining the Atonomi Network will be screened by existing members, assigned a default reputation score, and provided with a unique identifier for registering their devices. Trusted manufacturers will submit their devices via whitelist to the Identity Registry consensus service, which will be operated by select network members running a limited number of server instances.
* Device reputation will be collected, stored, and managed by a distributed network of ‘Audit partners’ which will be paid with through fees with Atonomi Tokens to track and score device behavior. How reputation scores will be calculated is not discussed in detail, only in very general terms.
* Competition includes IOTA, IBM Blockchain (Watson IoT), WISeKey, XAIN and Porsche, xage, slock.it, Nokia Sensing as a Service, and others.

Category Breakdown
Readiness

Is the product ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

1.0
N/A
1 - Nothing yet, just an idea.
Appeal

How appealing is the product? How good or necessary is it? Does it have a distinct edge?

4.0
N/A
4 - Captivating.
Target User Base

Is it mass market or niche?

5.0
N/A
5 - General audience / mass market.
Competition

Are there many other similar solutions or is this one of just a few, or even one of a kind?

2.0
N/A
2 - Quite a few / somewhat better competitors.
Innovation

How innovative or inventive is the product, either conceptually or technologically?

5.0
N/A
5 - Highly specialized, proprietary.
Product Score:
3.4

Use of Blockchain

* Atonomi’s Ethereum-based architecture combines on and off chain resources for scaling, though how exactly is not discussed. The whitepaper states that the company believes Ethereum to be sufficient for immediate use (since many of the platform’s operations do not require high throughput writes), but also intends to evaluate migration to or use of other solutions such as Plasma, Sharding, Swarm, Raiden, HashGraph, and others.
* The whitepaper states that the three patented technologies integrated into Atonomi’s service layer are: secure communications services (capable of creating a secure session in 3 milliseconds on average), multi-layer crypto key management (decentralized), and a fast indexing and searching method for decentralized encrypted data.
* The Identity Registry consensus service will be operated by select network members running a limited number of server instances. New manufacturers will be screened by existing members, and trusted manufacturers will submit their devices via whitelist to the consensus service.
* Device reputation will be managed by a distributed network of ‘Audit partners’ which will be paid with through fees with Atonomi Tokens. How reputation scores will be calculated is not discussed in detail, only in very general terms.
* Only Atonomi will be able to write to the Manufacturer Registry and the Auditor Registry. Manufacturers will be able to write to the Device Registry, while Auditors will be able to write to the Reputation Registry. Writing to the Device and Reputation registries may require or be rewarded with tokens.

Category Breakdown
Blockchain Development

Is blockchain technology essential? Does it make the solution significantly different and better?

3.0
N/A
3 - Automation; making something easier to do.
Disruptive Blockchain Advantage

How disruptive is the introduction of blockchain technology into the product's market space?

4.0
N/A
4 - Generally disruptive.
Need for a Custom Token (vs. BTC or ETH)

Is the token essential or could it be done just as well or better with fiat or Bitcoin?

4.0
N/A
4 - Token is essential to platform.
System Decentralization (besides token)

How decentralized is the system architecture other than the token (e.g., data collection, storage, access, and use, or decision making processes, etc.)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Hybrid; decentralized as far as circumstances allow.
Contribution to Blockchain Ecosystem

How compelling is the solution's contribution to the evolution of blockchain infrastructure and economy?

5.0
N/A
5 - Wow.
Use of Blockchain Score:
3.8

Whitepaper

The 26-page whitepaper is clear, concise, and easy to read. The whitepaper provides a well thought out planned architecture, with use of smart contracts, roles, use cases, etc., and goes into specifics in describing the applicability and advantages of CENTRI’s technology, but lacks definitiveness on features and particulars of the decentralized solution (such as how reputation scores are to be calculated, or what will be the payments/fees/rewards for different usage scenarios). The whitepaper contains a list with USPTO links to the company’s 10 patents.

Category Breakdown
Comprehensiveness

Does it cover the full scope of the problem and solution?

3.0
N/A
3 - Covers most key issues; a few holes.
Readability

Is it easy enough to understand?

4.0
N/A
4 - Easy to read and understand.
Transparency

Does it candidly describe and disclose where the project now stands, how much exists and how much still needs to be done, etc.?

4.0
N/A
4 - Informative disclosure.
Business Plan Presentation

Does it contain a viable, comprehensive business plan?

3.0
N/A
3 - More information required.
Technology Presentation

Does it present a well thought out technological architecture? Does it address implementational challenges?

4.0
N/A
4 - Clear, well thought out, realistic.
Whitepaper Score:
3.6

Roadmap

* No development roadmap is provided as of yet, not in the whitepaper nor on the website.
* A press release from Dec 2017 states that “Building on Ethereum technology, the Atonomi Network will provide an immutable blockchain-based identity and reputation service to secure the vast realm of IoT devices – ranging from home automation systems, to smart-city infrastructure, to industrial sensors and controllers.” The whitepaper states that the company believes Ethereum to be sufficient for immediate use (since many of the platform’s operations do not require high throughput writes), but also intends to evaluate migration to or use of other solutions such as Plasma, Sharding, Swarm, Raiden, HashGraph, and others.
* The press release also mentions that the project is backed by venture capital firm LaunchCapital.
* The company announced on January 15, 2018 that Swytch (renewable energy blockchain platform), will be the first organization to pilot the Atonomi Network.

Category Breakdown
Concreteness

Is there a concrete and practical development plan (vs. just a conceptual vision)?

2.0
N/A
2 - Vague, noncommittal.
Feasibility

Is the development plan realistic? Is it based on reasonable goals and timelines?

4.0
N/A
4 - Realistic.
Vision

Is there a larger, long-term vision?

5.0
N/A
5 - Paving the way for the future.
Dependencies (services or capabilities)

How available, operational, or trusted are the other systems or capabilities on which the project relies?

3.0
N/A
3 - Imperfect but available, or using substitutes.
Current Position

Where is the project now, relative to its vision and plans?

3.0
N/A
3 - Getting there.
Roadmap Score:
3.4

Compliance

* “The Atonomi Token [will be] used within the security protocol for device registration, activation, reputation management, and commerce transactions. Key participants such as OEM/device manufacturers, distributors, device owners and auditors are anticipated to seek Atonomi Token rewards for participating in the Atonomi Network.” Details regarding token utility, smart contract functionality, fee structures, etc. are not yet available.
* No legal documentation, disclaimer, risk assessment, etc. are provided at this time. This is entirely justifiable at the moment however, since the Atonomi Tokens are not yet being sold. In waiting to launch the token, the company may in fact be showing that it is highly aware of compliance issues and treating them professionally.

Category Breakdown
Token Utility (value through usage)

How much use is there for the token itself (regardless of its value as an investment vehicle)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Limited or uncertain use cases.
Token as Security (tradable instrument)

How valuable is the token as an investment vehicle or financial instrument?

4.0
N/A
4 - Not as such, or compliance is assured.
Token/Smart-Contract Readiness

Is the blockchain infrastructure of the project ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

1.0
N/A
1 - Nothing yet, just an idea.
Attention to Compliance Issues

How much attention is given to compliance (via token and ecosystem design, token sale participation, etc.)? Is this issue addressed directly and coherently?

5.0
N/A
5 - Professional, audited.
Legal Review/Risk Assessment

What kind of legal documentation (reviews or agreements) and risk assessment are provided?

1.0
N/A
1 - None available.
Compliance Score:
2.8

Company and Team

* Atonomi is being developed by CENTRI Technology, creator of Internet of Things Advanced Security. The company was founded in 2010, is based in Seattle, and states that its “current partners include the largest IoT ecosystem players like Arm, Flex, Microsoft, Intel, and others.” According to Crunchbase, CENTRI has so far raised $13.8M in 5 rounds, and the Atonomi project is stated to be backed by venture capital firm LaunchCapital. CENTRI’s core technology is protected by 10 patents linked to from the project’s website and whitepaper.
* The Atonomi core team is comprised of Founder and CEO Vaughan Emery (also Founder and CEO of CENTRI), Co-Founder and VP-Product David Fragale (former director at PwC and fellow and researcher at MIT), CTO and VP-Engineering Mike Mackey (same position at CENTRI, said to lead a 15-person engineering team), Chief Data Scientist Dr. Luis Paris (same position at CENTRI, website states that his PhD work led to the creation of CENTRI’s core technologies), and Strategic Development Partner Andrii Zamovsky (founder of Orderbook Ambisafe, and NoveltyLab). Additional team members are not listed but presumably include developers at CENTRI.
* Advisors include Dr. John Clippinger (Researcher at MIT, cofounder Token Commons), Peter Kinnaird (Head of Product at Ambisafe), Dr. David Kravitz (VP – Crypto Systems Research at DarkMatter, with former positions at IBM, TrustCentral, Certicom, Motorola, and others), Dr. Ulf Lindqvist (Senior Technical Director at SRI International), Rob May (Co-Founder and CEO at Talla and Botchain), and David Jevans (CEO at CipherTrace, Chairman at Anti-Phishing Working Group).
* While blockchain expertise appears to be provided mostly by advisors rather than the team, CENTRI is established in the field of IoT security, so its team members have extensive experience which is highly related and relevant.
* Atonomi’s website features the following statement: “Secure interoperability is essential for the Internet of Things to reach its full potential. The Atonomi blockchain technology vision for a global service that enables secure transactions and commerce through device identity and reputation is something Arm is excited to see realized.” -Ian Ferguson, VP Ecosystem Development, IoT Services Group at ARM

Category Breakdown
Company Stage and Foundation

Is the company already established? Has it raised funds before? Is it mature?

5.0
N/A
5 - Well established, has raised significant funds.
Background of Lead Team Members

Do we know who they are? Do they have LinkedIn profiles? Do they have solid, relevant backgrounds?

5.0
N/A
5 - Accomplished, recognized.
Team Assembly and Commitment

Is a solid, fully committed core team in place? Do they have online (e.g. LinkedIn) profiles showing sufficient relevant experience? Is their participation transparent?

4.0
N/A
4 - Fully assembled and committed.
Team Skill Set Relevance

Does the amount of talent and skill in each area seem to fit the project requirements?

5.0
N/A
5 - Meeting and exceeding project requirements.
Team Skill Set Balance

Is the team well-rounded (biz/tech/blockchain)? Is there sufficient talent and skill in all areas of required development?

4.0
N/A
4 - Good, sufficient for each aspect.
Company and Team Score:
4.6

Token Sale

* No details regarding the token sale are available as of yet.
* There does, however, seem to be noticeably growing interest, media presence and following.

Category Breakdown
Raise Amount Max

Is there a clear cap? Is the maximum raise amount modestly sufficient (as opposed to either greedy or insufficient)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Justifiable.
Raise Amount Min

Is the minimum raise reasonable considering the development plan? Are there raise-amount dependent milestones?

3.0
N/A
3 - Justifiable.
Fund Allocation

Is fund distribution and allocation reasonable and justified?

3.0
N/A
3 - Rough estimates, but sensible.
Token Allocation

Is the ratio of tokens sold to those kept reasonable? Does it prevent the company from having too much control?

3.0
N/A
3 - Sufficient company/community interest balance.
Media Presence and Following

Is the sale being talked about in Reddit, Bitcointalk, Social Media, Medium, etc.? Is information available and accessible? Is there interest?

4.0
N/A
4 - Solid exposure and interest, good impression.
Token Sale Score:
3.2

Use this code to share the ratings on your website