Faxport

Faxport is a sports business service and funding platform. Faxport will utilise naturally decentralised and unalterable distributed ledger technology to increase security and mutual trust levels.

About Faxport

Faxport aims to be a sports-related business service and funding platform, including a professional social network for recruitment, crowdfunding, etc. Faxport aims to establish an ecosystem that connects global sports commerce participants, service providers, and consumers, with “a sport-version Kickstarter” which “provides financing, incubation and acceleration service.” Faxport will utilize blockchain technology to increase security and mutual trust levels, reducing abuse and establishing a trust system for the global sports industry.
Competitors: LYMPO, Globatalent, Bravelog, Tokenstars, Misfit, SportyFi
Uniqueness/Advantages to competition: Provides a focus on recruiting needs in sports.

Token Sale Use of Blockchain

Product

2.8
Product
Readiness

Is the product ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

3.0
N/A
3 - Prototype / MVP / alpha.
Appeal

How appealing is the product? How good or necessary is it? Does it have a distinct edge?

3.0
N/A
3 - Interesting.
Target User Base

Is it mass market or niche?

4.0
N/A
4 - Large audience / wide market.
Competition

Are there many other similar solutions or is this one of just a few, or even one of a kind?

2.0
N/A
2 - Quite a few / somewhat better competitors.
Innovation

How innovative or inventive is the product, either conceptually or technologically?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some, but nothing outstanding.

Product

Faxport is meant to be a blockchain-based ecosystem for sports business services and funding. There is currently a publicly accessible github with five repositories for the project that are mostly token sale related including “ico” and “smart-contracts”. The public beta dev/testing, and full platform launch are planned for after the ICO (see Roadmap). There is appeal to the Faxport product, given the increasing demand for sports business services and funding and integration with blockchain technology. The potential / target user-base is the sport business marketplace which is very large across the globe (~$90 billion market in US alone) and the user-base will grow with cryptocurrency adoption in the general population. There is currently a large amount of legacy competition in the sector of sports business services and funding marketplace and blockchain competition will stiffen over time as cryptocurrency adoption continues.
Competitors: LYMPO, Globatalent, Bravelog, Tokenstars, Misfit, SportyFi

Product Whitepaper

Use of Blockchain

2.4
Use of Blockchain
Blockchain Development

Is blockchain technology essential? Does it make the solution significantly different and better?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some smart contract functionality.
Disruptive Blockchain Advantage

How disruptive is the introduction of blockchain technology into the product's market space?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some, but not much.
Need for a Custom Token (vs. BTC or ETH)

Is the token essential or could it be done just as well or better with fiat or Bitcoin?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some, mainly network effect.
System Decentralization (besides token)

How decentralized is the system architecture other than the token (e.g., data collection, storage, access, and use, or decision making processes, etc.)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Hybrid; decentralized as far as circumstances allow.
Contribution to Blockchain Ecosystem

How compelling is the solution's contribution to the evolution of blockchain infrastructure and economy?

3.0
N/A
3 - Interesting.

Use of Blockchain

Faxport is creating a platform for sports business and funding services, including recruiting, data-management, investing, crowdfunding and networking.

Faxport “combines the technology of smart contract, IPFS and traditional distributed database to storage data. Data survey work will be conducted by the dPOS authorisation consensus mechanism…”

“Faxport’s project utilizes blockchain technology, bringing together the usage and business environments of the sports industry and the sports ecosystem chain, providing a decentralized sports ecosystem chain with open platform services for business participants, which uses the operating platform ecosystem and holds Tokens to achieve its business goals.”

The token circulated by Faxport is based on the Ethereum standard ERC-20 and has the transaction code FAS. FAS can be used, in addition to the legal tender, to purchase FX credit on Faxport (the value of FX 1 credit is fixed at US$0.1), allowing further purchases of all kinds of service products on the platform. There is a 15% discount for using FAS for purchases compared to legal tender. The value of FAS will grow as the numbers of users and clients of the Faxport platform grows, with transaction prices rising on market transaction segments in tandem. In addition, there will be a 15% dividend for FAS holders every quarter based on the transaction service charge on the Faxport platform. FX is the only credit for payment purposes for a whole range of corporate services on the Faxport platform. The provider sets the FX price of the services, whilst the service purchaser pays in FX to obtain services. Every user who contributes data will be awarded FX. In addition, users can set the permission privileges and set prices for data they have contributed themselves. When encrypted data is purchased, the provider of said data will receive a corresponding award of FX.

Use of Blockchain Roadmap

Whitepaper

3.8
Whitepaper
Comprehensiveness

Does it cover the full scope of the problem and solution?

4.0
N/A
4 - Satisfactory coverage, well written.
Readability

Is it easy enough to understand?

4.0
N/A
4 - Easy to read and understand.
Transparency

Does it candidly describe and disclose where the project now stands, how much exists and how much still needs to be done, etc.?

3.0
N/A
3 - Basic honesty with some hype.
Business Plan Presentation

Does it contain a viable, comprehensive business plan?

4.0
N/A
4 - Clear, well thought out, realistic.
Technology Presentation

Does it present a well thought out technological architecture? Does it address implementational challenges?

4.0
N/A
4 - Clear, well thought out, realistic.

Whitepaper

The whitepaper is professional, informative and provides a balanced mixture of media and textual explanation. The whitepaper is 52 pages long and is overall readable and understandable. The whitepaper includes the following sections: Abstract, Market Analysis, The Product, Technological Framework, Faxport Platform Business Model, Tokens and Credit, Growth Trajectory, Team & Adviser, and Disclaimer. The business and technology plans behind Faxport are detailed and concisely explained including textual and graphical explanations. References are not provided.

Whitepaper Compliance

Roadmap

3.2
Roadmap
Concreteness

Is there a concrete and practical development plan (vs. just a conceptual vision)?

3.0
N/A
3 - An overall plan, major milestones stated.
Feasibility

Is the development plan realistic? Is it based on reasonable goals and timelines?

3.0
N/A
3 - Optimistic.
Vision

Is there a larger, long-term vision?

3.0
N/A
3 - A trend with potential.
Dependencies (services or capabilities)

How available, operational, or trusted are the other systems or capabilities on which the project relies?

4.0
N/A
4 - Available and trusted.
Current Position

Where is the project now, relative to its vision and plans?

3.0
N/A
3 - Getting there.

Roadmap

A vague project roadmap is given with milestones presented on a quarterly basis. Obstacles lie ahead as mobile app platform development/deployment, and final platform release will occur after the ICO. The roadmap provides major milestones and no descriptions of the intermediate steps required to complete each milestone.

Platform Roadmap:
2016 Q4: Faxport team established
2017 Q1: Faxport beta launched
2017 Q2: Completion of the database covering 40000+ projects and companies
2017 Q3: Faxport Collaborate with Chinese Company Kuaitiyu (Without Blockchain Solution)
2017 Q4: Media, recruitment and user system completed
2018 Q1: Faxport reached a cooperation intention in Japan / FAS Pre Sale
2018 Q2: FAS Crowdsale / Faxport formally engages in work in Japan
2018 Q3: Reward systems for recruitment, financing and users are completed atop the blockchain product
2018 Q4: Enter Asia market / FAX GO Sport Crowdfunding Platform demo launch
2019 Q1: Building blockchain product 2.0
2019 Q2: Launch enterprise-oriented data analysis, internal management and operation system (Web and Mobile)
2019 Q3: Entry into the North American and European markets

Roadmap Company and Team

Compliance

2.0
Compliance
Token Utility (value through usage)

How much use is there for the token itself (regardless of its value as an investment vehicle)?

2.0
N/A
2 - Minimal or contrived.
Token as Security (tradable instrument)

How valuable is the token as an investment vehicle or financial instrument?

2.0
N/A
2 - Primarily, with few additional rights.
Token/Smart-Contract Readiness

Is the blockchain infrastructure of the project ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

1.0
N/A
1 - Nothing yet, just an idea.
Attention to Compliance Issues

How much attention is given to compliance (via token and ecosystem design, token sale participation, etc.)? Is this issue addressed directly and coherently?

2.0
N/A
2 - Minimal, superficial or hackneyed.
Legal Review/Risk Assessment

What kind of legal documentation (reviews or agreements) and risk assessment are provided?

3.0
N/A
3 - Semi-professional (e.g. Howey Test)

Compliance

FAS can be used, in addition to the legal tender, to purchase FX credit on Faxport (the value of FX 1 credit is fixed at US$0.1), allowing further purchases of all kinds of service products on the platform. Holders of FAS will also receive 15% dividend every quarter based on the transaction service charge on the Faxport platform.
The token smart-contract code is not publicly available, although there is a publicly accessible github repository.
Compliance is addressed in the Terms and Conditions with direct statements of the reserved right to conduct AML & KYC Due Diligence as needed, and there is a registration whitelisting process, however one must only claim that that they are in compliance with the laws of their nation by particpating in the ICO and by clicking a check box which agrees to the terms and conditions of sale. The legal review and terms and conditions of the sale aim to absolve the company of any liability regarding the ICO and any problems that may occur, and provide a general statment that the tokens are not to be deemed a security.

Compliance Token Sale

Company and Team

3.6
Company and Team
Company Stage and Foundation

Is the company already established? Has it raised funds before? Is it mature?

4.0
N/A
4 - Established with some fundraising history.
Background of Lead Team Members

Do we know who they are? Do they have LinkedIn profiles? Do they have solid, relevant backgrounds?

3.0
N/A
3 - Minimally sufficient.
Team Assembly and Commitment

Is a solid, fully committed core team in place? Do they have online (e.g. LinkedIn) profiles showing sufficient relevant experience? Is their participation transparent?

4.0
N/A
4 - Fully assembled and committed.
Team Skill Set Relevance

Does the amount of talent and skill in each area seem to fit the project requirements?

4.0
N/A
4 - Well suited to project requirements.
Team Skill Set Balance

Is the team well-rounded (biz/tech/blockchain)? Is there sufficient talent and skill in all areas of required development?

3.0
N/A
3 - Somewhat uncertain, probably okay.

Company and Team

Faxport has an established team with 16 employees and 5 advisors.

The core team has experience in sports writing, recruiting, sports incubator projects, web/software development, machine learning, marketing, business development, and social media.
The advisors have experience in blockchain startup investing, ICO advising, tech development, business strategy, capital managment and investments.

Most of the core team has verifiable work experience credentials via LinkedIn profiles, though some profiles provide little information. Some members of the team appear to be dedicated to other projects outside of Faxport, however they are dedicated to projects directly related to the Faxport project.

Positives: The core team is well rounded and some advisors have previous experience with cryptocurrency/blockchain/smart-contract projects.
Negatives: Not all members may be fully dedicated to the project, there is currently no identified blockchain developer on the team, and new members are still being recruited.

Company and Team Product

Token Sale

3.2
Token Sale
Value Proposition of Token

How much of a need is there for the token? What is the token's utility value, and what is its value as a security?

4.0
N/A
4 - Well suited to needs and plans.
Token Economy

How well defined and sustainable is the token economy? This should include circulation, fees, earn/spend mechanisms, inflation/deflation mechanisms, etc.

4.0
N/A
4 - Reasonable, sensible.
System Decentralization (besides token)

How decentralized is the solution other than the token (e.g., data collection, storage, access, and use, or decision making processes, etc.)? The purpose here is not to penalize use of centralized components per se, but to assess how decentralization is incorporated.

3.0
N/A
3 - Rough estimates, but sensible.
Fundraising Goals (Min/Max Raise Amounts)

How sensible are the project's min/max raise amounts or soft/hard caps? (Related to Use of Proceeds but broader).

3.0
N/A
3 - Sufficient company/community interest balance.
Use of Proceeds (Fund Allocation)

How well-defined and sensible is the planned use of proceeds / fund allocation?

2.0
N/A
2 - Minor exposure and interest, or ambivalent reception.

Token Sale

Faxport Token (FAS)
Total supply: 200 million FAS
Soft Cap: $2.7 million
ICO Hard Cap: $7.5 million
Pre-Sale Cap: $6.0 million

Bonus
Pre Sale Pt.1 (25%) 1 ETH = 3,764.00 FAS
Pre Sale Pt.2 (20%) 1 ETH = 3,613.44 FAS
ICO Pt.1 (15%) 1 ETH = 3,462.88 FAS
ICO Pt.2 (10%) 1 ETH = 3,312.32 FAS
ICO Pt.3 (05%) 1 ETH = 3,161.76 FAS

Token Allocation
25% ICO
22% Faxport Ecosystem Preparation
20% Pre-Sale
15% Team (locked in for 4 years, with 25% released per year)
15% Investors and Advisors (locked in for 2 years)
03% Marketing Budget

ICO Proceeds Distribution
35% R&D
30% Sale & Marketing
15% Operations Expenses
15% Partner Networks
05% Reserve Funds

Social Media Presence & Following
There is little community engagment and reception.

Product

Faxport is meant to be a blockchain-based ecosystem for sports business services and funding. There is currently a publicly accessible github with five repositories for the project that are mostly token sale related including “ico” and “smart-contracts”. The public beta dev/testing, and full platform launch are planned for after the ICO (see Roadmap). There is appeal to the Faxport product, given the increasing demand for sports business services and funding and integration with blockchain technology. The potential / target user-base is the sport business marketplace which is very large across the globe (~$90 billion market in US alone) and the user-base will grow with cryptocurrency adoption in the general population. There is currently a large amount of legacy competition in the sector of sports business services and funding marketplace and blockchain competition will stiffen over time as cryptocurrency adoption continues.
Competitors: LYMPO, Globatalent, Bravelog, Tokenstars, Misfit, SportyFi

Category Breakdown
Readiness

Is the product ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

3.0
N/A
3 - Prototype / MVP / alpha.
Appeal

How appealing is the product? How good or necessary is it? Does it have a distinct edge?

3.0
N/A
3 - Interesting.
Target User Base

Is it mass market or niche?

4.0
N/A
4 - Large audience / wide market.
Competition

Are there many other similar solutions or is this one of just a few, or even one of a kind?

2.0
N/A
2 - Quite a few / somewhat better competitors.
Innovation

How innovative or inventive is the product, either conceptually or technologically?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some, but nothing outstanding.
Product Score:
2.8

Use of Blockchain

Faxport is creating a platform for sports business and funding services, including recruiting, data-management, investing, crowdfunding and networking.

Faxport “combines the technology of smart contract, IPFS and traditional distributed database to storage data. Data survey work will be conducted by the dPOS authorisation consensus mechanism…”

“Faxport’s project utilizes blockchain technology, bringing together the usage and business environments of the sports industry and the sports ecosystem chain, providing a decentralized sports ecosystem chain with open platform services for business participants, which uses the operating platform ecosystem and holds Tokens to achieve its business goals.”

The token circulated by Faxport is based on the Ethereum standard ERC-20 and has the transaction code FAS. FAS can be used, in addition to the legal tender, to purchase FX credit on Faxport (the value of FX 1 credit is fixed at US$0.1), allowing further purchases of all kinds of service products on the platform. There is a 15% discount for using FAS for purchases compared to legal tender. The value of FAS will grow as the numbers of users and clients of the Faxport platform grows, with transaction prices rising on market transaction segments in tandem. In addition, there will be a 15% dividend for FAS holders every quarter based on the transaction service charge on the Faxport platform. FX is the only credit for payment purposes for a whole range of corporate services on the Faxport platform. The provider sets the FX price of the services, whilst the service purchaser pays in FX to obtain services. Every user who contributes data will be awarded FX. In addition, users can set the permission privileges and set prices for data they have contributed themselves. When encrypted data is purchased, the provider of said data will receive a corresponding award of FX.

Category Breakdown
Blockchain Development

Is blockchain technology essential? Does it make the solution significantly different and better?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some smart contract functionality.
Disruptive Blockchain Advantage

How disruptive is the introduction of blockchain technology into the product's market space?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some, but not much.
Need for a Custom Token (vs. BTC or ETH)

Is the token essential or could it be done just as well or better with fiat or Bitcoin?

2.0
N/A
2 - Some, mainly network effect.
System Decentralization (besides token)

How decentralized is the system architecture other than the token (e.g., data collection, storage, access, and use, or decision making processes, etc.)?

3.0
N/A
3 - Hybrid; decentralized as far as circumstances allow.
Contribution to Blockchain Ecosystem

How compelling is the solution's contribution to the evolution of blockchain infrastructure and economy?

3.0
N/A
3 - Interesting.
Use of Blockchain Score:
2.4

Whitepaper

The whitepaper is professional, informative and provides a balanced mixture of media and textual explanation. The whitepaper is 52 pages long and is overall readable and understandable. The whitepaper includes the following sections: Abstract, Market Analysis, The Product, Technological Framework, Faxport Platform Business Model, Tokens and Credit, Growth Trajectory, Team & Adviser, and Disclaimer. The business and technology plans behind Faxport are detailed and concisely explained including textual and graphical explanations. References are not provided.

Category Breakdown
Comprehensiveness

Does it cover the full scope of the problem and solution?

4.0
N/A
4 - Satisfactory coverage, well written.
Readability

Is it easy enough to understand?

4.0
N/A
4 - Easy to read and understand.
Transparency

Does it candidly describe and disclose where the project now stands, how much exists and how much still needs to be done, etc.?

3.0
N/A
3 - Basic honesty with some hype.
Business Plan Presentation

Does it contain a viable, comprehensive business plan?

4.0
N/A
4 - Clear, well thought out, realistic.
Technology Presentation

Does it present a well thought out technological architecture? Does it address implementational challenges?

4.0
N/A
4 - Clear, well thought out, realistic.
Whitepaper Score:
3.8

Roadmap

A vague project roadmap is given with milestones presented on a quarterly basis. Obstacles lie ahead as mobile app platform development/deployment, and final platform release will occur after the ICO. The roadmap provides major milestones and no descriptions of the intermediate steps required to complete each milestone.

Platform Roadmap:
2016 Q4: Faxport team established
2017 Q1: Faxport beta launched
2017 Q2: Completion of the database covering 40000+ projects and companies
2017 Q3: Faxport Collaborate with Chinese Company Kuaitiyu (Without Blockchain Solution)
2017 Q4: Media, recruitment and user system completed
2018 Q1: Faxport reached a cooperation intention in Japan / FAS Pre Sale
2018 Q2: FAS Crowdsale / Faxport formally engages in work in Japan
2018 Q3: Reward systems for recruitment, financing and users are completed atop the blockchain product
2018 Q4: Enter Asia market / FAX GO Sport Crowdfunding Platform demo launch
2019 Q1: Building blockchain product 2.0
2019 Q2: Launch enterprise-oriented data analysis, internal management and operation system (Web and Mobile)
2019 Q3: Entry into the North American and European markets

Category Breakdown
Concreteness

Is there a concrete and practical development plan (vs. just a conceptual vision)?

3.0
N/A
3 - An overall plan, major milestones stated.
Feasibility

Is the development plan realistic? Is it based on reasonable goals and timelines?

3.0
N/A
3 - Optimistic.
Vision

Is there a larger, long-term vision?

3.0
N/A
3 - A trend with potential.
Dependencies (services or capabilities)

How available, operational, or trusted are the other systems or capabilities on which the project relies?

4.0
N/A
4 - Available and trusted.
Current Position

Where is the project now, relative to its vision and plans?

3.0
N/A
3 - Getting there.
Roadmap Score:
3.2

Compliance

FAS can be used, in addition to the legal tender, to purchase FX credit on Faxport (the value of FX 1 credit is fixed at US$0.1), allowing further purchases of all kinds of service products on the platform. Holders of FAS will also receive 15% dividend every quarter based on the transaction service charge on the Faxport platform.
The token smart-contract code is not publicly available, although there is a publicly accessible github repository.
Compliance is addressed in the Terms and Conditions with direct statements of the reserved right to conduct AML & KYC Due Diligence as needed, and there is a registration whitelisting process, however one must only claim that that they are in compliance with the laws of their nation by particpating in the ICO and by clicking a check box which agrees to the terms and conditions of sale. The legal review and terms and conditions of the sale aim to absolve the company of any liability regarding the ICO and any problems that may occur, and provide a general statment that the tokens are not to be deemed a security.

Category Breakdown
Token Utility (value through usage)

How much use is there for the token itself (regardless of its value as an investment vehicle)?

2.0
N/A
2 - Minimal or contrived.
Token as Security (tradable instrument)

How valuable is the token as an investment vehicle or financial instrument?

2.0
N/A
2 - Primarily, with few additional rights.
Token/Smart-Contract Readiness

Is the blockchain infrastructure of the project ready for use? Is there a working prototype or MVP? How long until it is operational?

1.0
N/A
1 - Nothing yet, just an idea.
Attention to Compliance Issues

How much attention is given to compliance (via token and ecosystem design, token sale participation, etc.)? Is this issue addressed directly and coherently?

2.0
N/A
2 - Minimal, superficial or hackneyed.
Legal Review/Risk Assessment

What kind of legal documentation (reviews or agreements) and risk assessment are provided?

3.0
N/A
3 - Semi-professional (e.g. Howey Test)
Compliance Score:
2.0

Company and Team

Faxport has an established team with 16 employees and 5 advisors.

The core team has experience in sports writing, recruiting, sports incubator projects, web/software development, machine learning, marketing, business development, and social media.
The advisors have experience in blockchain startup investing, ICO advising, tech development, business strategy, capital managment and investments.

Most of the core team has verifiable work experience credentials via LinkedIn profiles, though some profiles provide little information. Some members of the team appear to be dedicated to other projects outside of Faxport, however they are dedicated to projects directly related to the Faxport project.

Positives: The core team is well rounded and some advisors have previous experience with cryptocurrency/blockchain/smart-contract projects.
Negatives: Not all members may be fully dedicated to the project, there is currently no identified blockchain developer on the team, and new members are still being recruited.

Category Breakdown
Company Stage and Foundation

Is the company already established? Has it raised funds before? Is it mature?

4.0
N/A
4 - Established with some fundraising history.
Background of Lead Team Members

Do we know who they are? Do they have LinkedIn profiles? Do they have solid, relevant backgrounds?

3.0
N/A
3 - Minimally sufficient.
Team Assembly and Commitment

Is a solid, fully committed core team in place? Do they have online (e.g. LinkedIn) profiles showing sufficient relevant experience? Is their participation transparent?

4.0
N/A
4 - Fully assembled and committed.
Team Skill Set Relevance

Does the amount of talent and skill in each area seem to fit the project requirements?

4.0
N/A
4 - Well suited to project requirements.
Team Skill Set Balance

Is the team well-rounded (biz/tech/blockchain)? Is there sufficient talent and skill in all areas of required development?

3.0
N/A
3 - Somewhat uncertain, probably okay.
Company and Team Score:
3.6

Token Sale

Faxport Token (FAS)
Total supply: 200 million FAS
Soft Cap: $2.7 million
ICO Hard Cap: $7.5 million
Pre-Sale Cap: $6.0 million

Bonus
Pre Sale Pt.1 (25%) 1 ETH = 3,764.00 FAS
Pre Sale Pt.2 (20%) 1 ETH = 3,613.44 FAS
ICO Pt.1 (15%) 1 ETH = 3,462.88 FAS
ICO Pt.2 (10%) 1 ETH = 3,312.32 FAS
ICO Pt.3 (05%) 1 ETH = 3,161.76 FAS

Token Allocation
25% ICO
22% Faxport Ecosystem Preparation
20% Pre-Sale
15% Team (locked in for 4 years, with 25% released per year)
15% Investors and Advisors (locked in for 2 years)
03% Marketing Budget

ICO Proceeds Distribution
35% R&D
30% Sale & Marketing
15% Operations Expenses
15% Partner Networks
05% Reserve Funds

Social Media Presence & Following
There is little community engagment and reception.

Category Breakdown
Value Proposition of Token

How much of a need is there for the token? What is the token's utility value, and what is its value as a security?

4.0
N/A
4 - Well suited to needs and plans.
Token Economy

How well defined and sustainable is the token economy? This should include circulation, fees, earn/spend mechanisms, inflation/deflation mechanisms, etc.

4.0
N/A
4 - Reasonable, sensible.
System Decentralization (besides token)

How decentralized is the solution other than the token (e.g., data collection, storage, access, and use, or decision making processes, etc.)? The purpose here is not to penalize use of centralized components per se, but to assess how decentralization is incorporated.

3.0
N/A
3 - Rough estimates, but sensible.
Fundraising Goals (Min/Max Raise Amounts)

How sensible are the project's min/max raise amounts or soft/hard caps? (Related to Use of Proceeds but broader).

3.0
N/A
3 - Sufficient company/community interest balance.
Use of Proceeds (Fund Allocation)

How well-defined and sensible is the planned use of proceeds / fund allocation?

2.0
N/A
2 - Minor exposure and interest, or ambivalent reception.
Token Sale Score:
3.2

Use this code to share the ratings on your website